In my previous post, An Infinite Sphere Whose Centre is Everywhere and Circumference is Nowhere, I wrote that Nicholas of Cusa’s (1401-1464) sentence “the world-machine will have its center everywhere and its circumference nowhere” gave the impression that Cusa believed the universe to be infinite.
"The universe is not physically bounded, but bounded by the fact that it is lesser than God..."
Yes this is a loose definition of the Vedic 'Purusha and Prakriti', where Purusha is considered the essence of God, although not an exact meaning because English doesn't have a good enough translation.
Prakriti on the other hand is considered matter, which would surely include plasma and potentiality which isn't exactly matter per se, and this is where physics is strangely defined in the Vedanta but with different words and our "religious" connotations of them. It's rather strange because we put meanings on to the words without realising it's the same unseen structure of reality being described. Truth is eternal and there is nothing new under the sun etc.
As for indefinite vs. infinite, Guénon had a good perspective: only God was Infinite, everything else was indefinite. (This assists the description of Purusha & Prakriti too.)
Several if not all (it's a constant theme) including Symbolism of the Cross and Multiple States of the Being. When I half-challenged you a month or two back about who gets to read his 'Metaphysical Principles of the Infinitesimal Calculus' I wasn't joking and bought the book. I haven't picked it up yet, but I'm sure he'll go to town on it. He was a pedantic mathematician and metaphysician extraordinaire.
The biggest crossover between metaphysics and electrical phenomena to my mind - without it being mentioned explicitly of course - was in Man and His Becoming According to the Vedanta.
"The universe is not physically bounded, but bounded by the fact that it is lesser than God..."
Yes this is a loose definition of the Vedic 'Purusha and Prakriti', where Purusha is considered the essence of God, although not an exact meaning because English doesn't have a good enough translation.
Prakriti on the other hand is considered matter, which would surely include plasma and potentiality which isn't exactly matter per se, and this is where physics is strangely defined in the Vedanta but with different words and our "religious" connotations of them. It's rather strange because we put meanings on to the words without realising it's the same unseen structure of reality being described. Truth is eternal and there is nothing new under the sun etc.
As for indefinite vs. infinite, Guénon had a good perspective: only God was Infinite, everything else was indefinite. (This assists the description of Purusha & Prakriti too.)
Dear old Bruno.
And what Indic sources in English- (or other) language translation are relevant?
The Vedas and the Upanishads. I went straight to Guénon because he distills them well. Man and His Becoming was the most obvious to my mind but ymmv.
In which work does Guénon address these issues?
Several if not all (it's a constant theme) including Symbolism of the Cross and Multiple States of the Being. When I half-challenged you a month or two back about who gets to read his 'Metaphysical Principles of the Infinitesimal Calculus' I wasn't joking and bought the book. I haven't picked it up yet, but I'm sure he'll go to town on it. He was a pedantic mathematician and metaphysician extraordinaire.
The biggest crossover between metaphysics and electrical phenomena to my mind - without it being mentioned explicitly of course - was in Man and His Becoming According to the Vedanta.